ALC+Team+Page

=Considering the Global Perspectives of the United States, Mexico, and Columbia on growing and exporting cocaine across the Mexico-US border=

media type="youtube" key="DfRAVONRyZ4" width="560" height="315"
What did you compare in your analysis?
 * We compared/contrasted the resolutions, characters, and internal responses. **

What major similarities did you notice across your gathered information? (Cite at least two of the narrative frame elements)
 * From all perspectives, the Mexicans earn a better standard of living from being part of drug trafficking than the usual occupations. In addition, all countries' leaders have been involved in trying to eradicate the drug problem in Mexico. In addition, the Mexican military and President Calderon have been behind the change. **

What major differences did you notice across your gathered information? (Cite at least two of the narrative frame elements)
 * Columbia had a non-chalant attitude towards the problem whereas the US admitted their part in the situation and has attempted to fix it. The resolution from the US perspective is ongoing whereas the Mexico resolution is cooperation with the US and the Columbia resolution is global cooperation. **

What could account for the differences between the global perspectives of idea/event you analyzed? (Be specific!)
 * The corruption in Mexico shades all perspectives plus the economic need. The Columbia perspective is also in economic need of the drug crops as well. The US shifts blame for its own profit and uses Mexico's drug trafficking to gain access Latin American markets. **

Has your analysis of the various global perspectives changed your own perspective on the idea/event?
 * These perspectives gave us a different outlook on the US and its real motives in global events. **